4.- Update for 1-june-2001. The EYE and eye-socket in "Brave" and "Kiss". Two compositions at highest resolution:

It is very unfortunate that a team of NASA headed by geologist Jim Garvin has chosen to make the war against FoM. Some say that it is just 'bad faith': sort of conspiracy to cover-up for dubious reasons of 'whatever'.. even merely to test us and other defenders of FoM to see what is our view at length (a troll). We at UNIAM do not partake such view of incrimination against a team of NASA. We consider that their scurrilous publication of 24-may-2001 is just that: a scurrilous and totally incompetent comment about their last (excellent) image of FoM at noon. Here we will make 'critique' of their publication. Above it can be seen, at best available resolution, the bass-relief detail of the 'eye' in character 'Kiss' shown in page IIa. So NASA's statement: "There is no eyes, no nose, no mouth." becomes obviously FALSE; just a stupid statement based in idiotic assumption of an expected 3D sculpture similar to our terrestrial Art-works in Sphinx (or at Mount Rushmore) which are symmetrical. We already explained that FoM is NOT symmetrical and why. More later.
See below the same image-composition with the obvious wrinkles below eyeball; and also the basic SHAPES of eyeball for all human races: from the roundish one of afro-european races to the typical oriental at small angle rather than quite horizontal. The tiny line-marks are there and even a hint to the very common operation for cataracts in the upper cross-crack. A bio-medical drawing of 'eye' with these and probably more details are clearly set in that precious eye of "Kiss". Yes: THERE IS EYE!. But the Fine-Art for it is not sculptural; it is 'scientific sketch' in bass-relief as all GLYPH-LIKE set up for FoM.

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&


5.- UPDATE for 2-june-2001. There are "nose & mouth"; and chin with a dimple; and beautiful flat nostril and the lips of a kissing maiden or woman wrapped in complete veil. The "Brave" and "Kiss" are being compared:

These 2 compositions which follow are fundamental. Nothing about FoM can be understood without careful study of, here presented, correspondence of 'artistic looks' of the demi-face "Brave" at late sunset and those of demi-face "Kiss", TOTALLY DIFFERENT, at around noon time. They could not be
the same nor even similar (of course) from spacecraft point of view which detects only shadows: so the martian Artist chose this magnificent combination of 'elements', as carved in the Face-mesa, to convey a multiportrait of 'martian civilization'. This 'civilization' grew from 'young' (but already in underground habitats), as shown in 'Brave', up to a conservative adult (and loving) mother of all intelligent life in the solar system, as shown in "Kiss".
Then came normal problems ("Anger") and even death ("Sacred") to be described later.

This is more than enough to calm the furor of FoM and those who defend it, after the silly and unilateral declaration of lack of artificiality in FoM by a party with label NASA. Such declaration is a change in policy: NASA had said repeatedly that the question of 'artificiality' had to be left as open to debate because it transcends the scope of NASA's work. Indeed, that was exactly what the late Dr. G.A. Soffen privately communicated to his friend Dr. D.G. Lahoz ("I don't want to be involved".. meaning: NASA cannot be involved in such martian ETI debate). And when we thought that the issue was settled in favor of artificiality, comes Jim Garvin, with logos of NASA, telling us the opposite. Please, speak for yourself personally and leave intact the honor and grace of NASA and his prominent champion Dr. G.A. Soffen who cannot moderate you anymore.