Home

The 3 NASA images. /id1.html
MGS negative. Interpretation. /id2.html
Not Van Flandern but Ignatius. /id3.html
New partial images. /id4.html
Contact Me. /id5.html
For possible updates (5-2001). /id6.html
Links. /id7.html
For possible updates (6-2001). /id8.html
For possible updates (6-2001). /id9.html
For possible updates (6-2001). /id10.html
For possible updates (6-2001). /id11.html
For possible updates (7-2001). /id12.html
For possible updates (8-2001). /id13.html
For possible updates (8-2001). /id14.html
For possible updates (11-2001). /id15.html
For possible updates (12-2001). /id16.html
For possible updates (12-2001). /id17.html
First images from Odyssey. // id18.html
Commentary for mathematicians. // id19.html
Underground of Cydonia in IR ? // id 20.html
Face on Mars. Critique.
Commentary for mathematicians. // id19.html

Fine-Art in the 'Face' is sufficient proof of artificiality for well trained Art critics: its fourfold aspect of shadows using negatives and positives was intended to increase bandwith of information as fully described in present Website. Mathematicians and other very skeptic scientists required a 'hard core' evidence of artificiality and that was also provided by the martian designers. A set of sharp, small, mound-marks, easily induced as for their precisely intended positions, was used. Vastly superior mathematics and computer science to all our current terrestrial capabilities ensures such 'hard core' of evidence of artificiality as in here presented.

Internet exchanges

Fit of A15 mound-mark